"Then the King will say to those on his right, 'Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.' (Matthew 25:34-36)
These words, spoken by our Lord, have really made a difference in how I look at the world today. My wife Debbie and I are involved in ministering to folks who are homeless. What a homeless friend of mine calls “housing challenged”.
Our church participates in an area-wide homeless housing program called ChristNet, which essentially feeds and houses those in need through the fall, winter, and spring months in Detroit’s Downriver area. Each week from September through May a different church will host ChristNet, allowing up to 30 guests each night to eat and sleep in a safe, warm, friendly environment.
Debbie has always had a heart for the homeless, but I have to admit, until we first participated in the ChristNet program, I hadn’t given homelessness much thought. Sure, I would see the occasional homeless person walking down the street, but it would never even enter my mind to stop and engage that person in conversation. Wow! How things have changed! Jesus has really worked through Debbie to touch the lives of people that in the past I never would have given a second thought about.
Last month we decided to head to downtown Detroit to talk to some homeless people, to listen to their stories, to feed them, and to let them know that Jesus loves them. It was truly uplifting to see how much trust many of them have in God in spite of their circumstances. We came back excited and refreshed, and most of all, I think we made a difference to them, even if only for a day.
After relating our experience to Shawn, the youth minister at our church, he decided that a youth group service project was in order. A few Friday evenings later we made about 50 peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, loaded up 2 cases of water and 120 bags of potato chips and headed to Hart Plaza with several adults and a group of our teens.
We handed out all of our food and water that night, talked to many homeless folks, and prayed with them. They loved it! It meant so much to them to know that God was there with them working through us, feeding them, giving them a listening ear, treating them the way anyone would want to (and should be) be treated. I think our teens learned a valuable lesson that night, and my prayer is that they will remember that night every time they come across someone in need.
In Matthew 25:40, Jesus said
"The King will reply, 'I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.'
Let’s keep in mind those priceless words from our King!
Wednesday, June 14, 2006
Wednesday, May 17, 2006
The Body of Christ
I have been pondering a question about the bread and fruit of the vine and whether or not it truly is the body and blood of Christ in a literal sense.
I grew up in the Catholic tradition, and transubstantiation is a doctrine that was considered tantamount to being Catholic, if you didn't believe in transubstantiation, you were considered a heretic and technically no longer a Catholic. At least that's how it was taught to me.
This post is meant mainly to address the Catholic idea of transubstantiation, and how I feel about it, but I think that much of it could also be applied to the Lutheran concept of consubstantiation as well. I don't know as much about the Lutheran doctrine, but I think it is somewhat similar to the Catholic idea, with only slight differences.
I can't claim that these are all my own ideas, because they aren't. I have been studying the Lord's Supper over the summer, and have drawn this out of many resources, most importantly, the Bible.
Another resource that I have used extensively (aside from the internet, and you know, if it's on the internet it has to be true, right?), is John Mark Hicks book, "Revisioning the Lord's Supper". If you haven't read it, I would highly recommend it to you. He gets deep into the idea of Old Testament fellowship at table and how it should carry over to the table today.
One of the major problems I have with transubstantiation is the idea that at every mass, Christ is crucified all over again, His body is broken and His blood is spilled during the rite spoken by the priest. This is an integral part of the transubstantiation doctrine, that Christ is re-sacrificed at every mass. But in Hebrews 7:27 it says "Unlike the other high priests, he does not need to offer sacrifices day after day, first for his own sins, and then for the sins of the people. He sacrificed for their sins once for all when he offered himself." It doesn't say that Jesus keeps dying over and over again, week after week, at churches all over the world.
Another key difficulty with transubstantiation for me is that Jesus constantly uses symbolism to describe spiritual ideas. In John 6, which is probably the book/chapter that most Catholics would point to in order to justify transubstantiation, Jesus uses many different metaphors to speak of spiritual truths. In fact, before He speaks about eating His flesh, Jesus has already told the unbelievers four times that they must BELIEVE in Him in order to have life.
Jesus tells them in John 6:51 "I am the living bread that came down from heaven. If anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever. This bread is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world." If we interpret the verses that you must literally eat Jesus' body and blood, we run into problems.
This verse claims that you must eat His body and drink His blood in order to have eternal life. Over and over again in this chapter, Jesus made it clear that eternal life came from believing in Him. We "eat" Jesus only in a spiritual sense. Eating isn't a spiritual act, but believing in Him is. If we take this verse literally, we see that the thief on the cross didn't eat Jesus' body or drink His blood, so Jesus would have to have been lying when He told him that he would be with Him in heaven that very day.
In John 6, Jesus was illustrating spiritual truths with earthly examples. Eternal life comes from belief in Christ, not from eating the bread. Near the end of the chapter, in verse 63, Jesus tells the disciples that He was talking about spiritual truths: "The Spirit gives life; the flesh counts for nothing. The words I have spoken to you are spirit and they are life."
Luke 22:10-20 says, "And he took bread, gave thanks and broke it, and gave it to them, saying, "This is my body given for you; do this in remembrance of me." In the same way, after the supper he took the cup, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you." When you look at the context of the situation, I don't think that these words were meant to be taken literally. How could Jesus, who was still present in His own body, say that bread and wine were His body and blood? Jesus told them to commemorate His sacrifice and New Covenant by using the bread and wine as symbols of His body and blood.
Jesus also said that He was able to give "living water:" Jesus answered her, "If you knew the gift of God and who it is that asks you for a drink, you would have asked him and he would have given you living water." John 4:10This is one of the best examples that Jesus may have been talking about the same thing in John 4 as in John 6. Both times, He uses the word "living." Jesus is the "living bread" and the "living water." I think he was referring not to a physical reality, but to spiritual truths. The way that bread is needed for physical life, water is also needed for physical life.
But Jesus gives us the living (spiritual) water that we need for eternal life:
Jesus answered, "Everyone who drinks this water will be thirsty again, but whoever drinks the water I give him will never thirst. Indeed, the water I give him will become in him a spring of water welling up to eternal life." John 4:13-14
I grew up in the Catholic tradition, and transubstantiation is a doctrine that was considered tantamount to being Catholic, if you didn't believe in transubstantiation, you were considered a heretic and technically no longer a Catholic. At least that's how it was taught to me.
This post is meant mainly to address the Catholic idea of transubstantiation, and how I feel about it, but I think that much of it could also be applied to the Lutheran concept of consubstantiation as well. I don't know as much about the Lutheran doctrine, but I think it is somewhat similar to the Catholic idea, with only slight differences.
I can't claim that these are all my own ideas, because they aren't. I have been studying the Lord's Supper over the summer, and have drawn this out of many resources, most importantly, the Bible.
Another resource that I have used extensively (aside from the internet, and you know, if it's on the internet it has to be true, right?), is John Mark Hicks book, "Revisioning the Lord's Supper". If you haven't read it, I would highly recommend it to you. He gets deep into the idea of Old Testament fellowship at table and how it should carry over to the table today.
One of the major problems I have with transubstantiation is the idea that at every mass, Christ is crucified all over again, His body is broken and His blood is spilled during the rite spoken by the priest. This is an integral part of the transubstantiation doctrine, that Christ is re-sacrificed at every mass. But in Hebrews 7:27 it says "Unlike the other high priests, he does not need to offer sacrifices day after day, first for his own sins, and then for the sins of the people. He sacrificed for their sins once for all when he offered himself." It doesn't say that Jesus keeps dying over and over again, week after week, at churches all over the world.
Another key difficulty with transubstantiation for me is that Jesus constantly uses symbolism to describe spiritual ideas. In John 6, which is probably the book/chapter that most Catholics would point to in order to justify transubstantiation, Jesus uses many different metaphors to speak of spiritual truths. In fact, before He speaks about eating His flesh, Jesus has already told the unbelievers four times that they must BELIEVE in Him in order to have life.
Jesus tells them in John 6:51 "I am the living bread that came down from heaven. If anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever. This bread is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world." If we interpret the verses that you must literally eat Jesus' body and blood, we run into problems.
This verse claims that you must eat His body and drink His blood in order to have eternal life. Over and over again in this chapter, Jesus made it clear that eternal life came from believing in Him. We "eat" Jesus only in a spiritual sense. Eating isn't a spiritual act, but believing in Him is. If we take this verse literally, we see that the thief on the cross didn't eat Jesus' body or drink His blood, so Jesus would have to have been lying when He told him that he would be with Him in heaven that very day.
In John 6, Jesus was illustrating spiritual truths with earthly examples. Eternal life comes from belief in Christ, not from eating the bread. Near the end of the chapter, in verse 63, Jesus tells the disciples that He was talking about spiritual truths: "The Spirit gives life; the flesh counts for nothing. The words I have spoken to you are spirit and they are life."
Luke 22:10-20 says, "And he took bread, gave thanks and broke it, and gave it to them, saying, "This is my body given for you; do this in remembrance of me." In the same way, after the supper he took the cup, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you." When you look at the context of the situation, I don't think that these words were meant to be taken literally. How could Jesus, who was still present in His own body, say that bread and wine were His body and blood? Jesus told them to commemorate His sacrifice and New Covenant by using the bread and wine as symbols of His body and blood.
Jesus also said that He was able to give "living water:" Jesus answered her, "If you knew the gift of God and who it is that asks you for a drink, you would have asked him and he would have given you living water." John 4:10This is one of the best examples that Jesus may have been talking about the same thing in John 4 as in John 6. Both times, He uses the word "living." Jesus is the "living bread" and the "living water." I think he was referring not to a physical reality, but to spiritual truths. The way that bread is needed for physical life, water is also needed for physical life.
But Jesus gives us the living (spiritual) water that we need for eternal life:
Jesus answered, "Everyone who drinks this water will be thirsty again, but whoever drinks the water I give him will never thirst. Indeed, the water I give him will become in him a spring of water welling up to eternal life." John 4:13-14
Friday, April 14, 2006
God wants to Fellowship with us!
Good Morning! Reading Roland Bainton's biography of Martin Luther has given me a new understanding of the man who defied the pope and helped bring Germany, and ultimately the world, to discover God's grace. (If you get a chance to read this book, do it.)
Grace is such a difficult thing to grasp, even today. How could a sovereign holy God bring Himself down to our level? He doesn't! He brings us UP through the blood of His Son. But why does He do it? God wants to fellowship with us. He wants us to love Him for who He is. He doesn't need or want robots that are compelled or forced to worship Him, but loving children in adoration of their wonderful Father.
What a hard thing to understand sometimes, but it is all so easy. He made us, He loves us, He wants us to be His children, and He was willing to sacrifice His Son in order to have this fellowship with us.
So, what is Grace? Our pulpit minister tells us it is a "gift we don't deserve", and he’s right. But it is so much more than that. It is God's remarkable, wonderful loving-kindness made real and whole. It is Jesus on the cross saying "Forgive them, for they know not what they do". It's Jesus kissing Judas on his cheek, knowing even then what he had done, still loving and caring for him. It is the Resurrection. In the end, it is pure, holy, selfless LOVE! How do YOU define Grace?
Grace is such a difficult thing to grasp, even today. How could a sovereign holy God bring Himself down to our level? He doesn't! He brings us UP through the blood of His Son. But why does He do it? God wants to fellowship with us. He wants us to love Him for who He is. He doesn't need or want robots that are compelled or forced to worship Him, but loving children in adoration of their wonderful Father.
What a hard thing to understand sometimes, but it is all so easy. He made us, He loves us, He wants us to be His children, and He was willing to sacrifice His Son in order to have this fellowship with us.
So, what is Grace? Our pulpit minister tells us it is a "gift we don't deserve", and he’s right. But it is so much more than that. It is God's remarkable, wonderful loving-kindness made real and whole. It is Jesus on the cross saying "Forgive them, for they know not what they do". It's Jesus kissing Judas on his cheek, knowing even then what he had done, still loving and caring for him. It is the Resurrection. In the end, it is pure, holy, selfless LOVE! How do YOU define Grace?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)